As the world’s oldest international sporting competition, the America’s Cup has always been a stage for intense rivalry, strategic decisions, and technological innovation.
The Kiwis, or the New Zealand team, have been a dominant force in this prestigious sailing event. However, their journey has not been without its share of tough decisions and challenges. This article delves into some of the most significant decisions made by the Kiwis in the America’s Cup, their implications, and the lessons learned.
Table of Contents
- Decision 1: The Switch to Multihulls
- Decision 2: The Introduction of Cyclors
- Decision 3: The Controversial Call in 2013
- Conclusion
Decision 1: The Switch to Multihulls
In 2010, the Kiwis made a bold decision to switch from monohulls to multihulls, specifically catamarans, for the 34th America’s Cup. This was a significant departure from their traditional approach and required a complete overhaul of their design and sailing strategies. The decision was driven by the desire to increase the speed and excitement of the races, but it also came with increased risks and challenges.
Despite initial skepticism, the decision paid off. The Kiwis’ AC72 catamaran, with its revolutionary wing sail and hydrofoiling capabilities, proved to be a game-changer. They dominated the early stages of the competition, winning 8 of the first 11 races. However, they ultimately lost to Oracle Team USA in a dramatic comeback, a result that was attributed in part to the American team’s superior understanding and use of the new technology.
Decision 2: The Introduction of Cyclors
For the 35th America’s Cup in 2017, the Kiwis made another innovative decision: the introduction of “cyclors”. Instead of traditional grinders, who generate power for the boat’s hydraulic systems by turning handles, the Kiwis used cyclists. This decision was based on the belief that cyclists could generate more power and endurance than grinders.
Again, the decision was controversial. Critics argued that it was a gimmick and that the traditional grinding method was more reliable. However, the Kiwis’ cyclors proved to be a key advantage. They were able to generate more power, which allowed the team to make more maneuvers and adjustments during the races. This contributed to their victory over Oracle Team USA and their successful reclaiming of the America’s Cup.
Decision 3: The Controversial Call in 2013
One of the most controversial decisions in the Kiwis’ America’s Cup history occurred during the 34th America’s Cup in 2013. In the eighth race, with the Kiwis leading 6-1, the race was abandoned due to exceeding the time limit. The Kiwis were just two minutes away from winning the race and potentially the Cup when the decision was made.
The decision was heavily criticized, with many believing that it cost the Kiwis the Cup. However, it also highlighted the importance of understanding and adapting to the rules and conditions of the competition. Despite the disappointment, the Kiwis learned valuable lessons from the experience, which they applied in their successful campaign in the next America’s Cup.
Conclusion
The Kiwis’ journey in the America’s Cup has been marked by bold decisions and innovative strategies. While not all of their decisions have led to immediate success, they have shown a willingness to take risks and challenge conventions. This approach, combined with their resilience and learning mindset, has made them one of the most successful and respected teams in the history of the America’s Cup.
As the Kiwis prepare for future America’s Cup competitions, they will undoubtedly face more tough decisions. However, their track record suggests that they will continue to push the boundaries and strive for excellence, regardless of the challenges they face.
For more information on the America’s Cup and the Kiwis’ journey, check out these resources:
